By DAVID RAINER, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
The 2016 spring season may have ended Saturday with a bang or with a whimper for Alabama’s turkey hunters. For some, it was the spring of hope. For others, it was the spring of despair.
“It just depends on who you talk to,” said Chuck Sykes, Director of the Alabama Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Division. “Some people are griping and complaining. Some said it was the worst season they’ve ever had. Some said it was the best season they’ve ever had.”
Sykes said the condition of the habitat appears to be the driving factor in the success or disappointment for the hunters.
“It just depends on the property you were hunting,” he said. “On one piece of property I hunted, there were trail camera pictures during deer season and trail camera pictures during the spring. But, they just didn’t gobble the days I hunted. That doesn’t mean the turkeys weren’t there, that disease had killed them or they just disappeared. They just didn’t gobble, and that makes for an unhappy hunter.
“For the vast majority of us, deer-hunting a turkey is not something we enjoy doing. We want to hear them gobble. We want to play with them. We want to make them call.”
The worst-case scenario is when the property does not support a huntable population of turkeys.
“On some property, there weren’t any turkeys there,” Sykes said. “At other places, turkeys gobbled their brains out. So it was all site-specific. Honestly, there may have been more turkeys in the ’80s, but I don’t know that for a fact.”
Sykes blames social media for much of the season of discontent. In the 1980s, very little information was distributed about turkey hunting success, and the veracity of that information was always extremely suspect.
“If somebody kills a turkey and posts a photo of it on Facebook, and 15 of their friends didn’t kill one, what does that do,” he said. “It makes them unhappy. Twenty years ago, you didn’t know about it. If you went turkey hunting and didn’t hear anything, you went to work.”
Sykes thinks social media has had the same effect on hunter satisfaction for turkey hunters as trail cameras for deer hunters.
“There are a lot of unhappy deer hunters because they can’t kill that 130-inch deer they are seeing from 11:30 (p.m.) to 3 (a.m.) on their trail cameras,” he said. “Twenty years ago we just hunted. We thought there was a good deer there. If we didn’t see him, well, we just didn’t see him. Now we get upset because the deer is nocturnal.
“It’s the same with turkey hunters. Some people are going to kill turkeys and some aren’t.”
Sykes, who counts turkey guide and wildlife management consultant as previous vocations, said the ideal habitat for turkeys hasn’t changed in the last 30 years.
“It’s the same,” he said. “It’s proper timber management with burning and wildlife openings. It’s also predator control. But the biggest key is brood-rearing habitat. Old field-style habitat with clover plots that produce a bunch of bugs. You want a two-year-old burn that has some understory where hens can successfully nest and bring off little ones. You want roads connecting to make it easy to get around and pick bugs. Then if there’s a problem, they can duck back in the bushes. To me brood-rearing habitat is the key to turkey numbers.
“It’s not 1,000 acres of big, over-mature hardwood forest that’s pretty and makes you feel good. People tell me they saw tons of turkeys in there during bow season. I said, ‘Sure you did. There were tons of acorns. What’s in there for them to eat now? Not much.’”